Christopher Branch was one of my earliest English ancestors in America, arriving in the Virginia Colony, with his wife, in March 1620 (1619 Old Style). Unlike many of the first settlers, who found only hardship and all-to-often an early death, Christopher, through luck and his own hard work, was able to attain the success that all English immigrants surely hoped for when they boarded some tiny wooden vessel and set sail for the so-called "New World," never, in most cases, to ever see England again. It was not an easy thing to do because there was no guarantee that the ship would ever reach port, nor was there any guarantee that the immigrant would find what he or she was looking for in what was then a largely unknown land. Thanks to the daring and hardiness of Christopher and his wife, along with others like them, I can truly say that our family was there at the very beginning of what would eventually become the United States of America. Or, to put it another way: The seed-bed of modern America and the seed-bed of our family are one and the same.

All available sources regarding Christopher Branch agree that he was born on September 2, in London, England, but some disagree as to the year. One source says 1598, another 1600, a third says 1602. Only the first is possible though, because his mother died in August 1600. All sources agree, however, that his parents were Lionel Branch, previously of Abingdon, Berkshire, England. and Valentina Sparke, who were married at St. Martin Church, Ludgate, London, on July 8, 1596. Although a church still stands on the site, which is close by St. Paul's Cathedral, the original, the building in which Lionel Branch and his bride said their vows, was destroyed in the Great Fire of London in 1666. Construction of the present building, designed by Sir Christopher Wren, was completed in 1703. (See St. Martin Ludgate for more information.)

Christopher Branch's mother, Valentina, died on August 4. 1600, when he (Christopher) was nearly two years old. The parish register of St. Margaret's Church, Westminster (adjacent to Westminster Abbey), records her death and burial.

Christopher's father, Lionel, died in 1605, leaving him an orphan at age seven. The identity of the person or persons who raised him to adulthood is unknown.

According to the parish records of St. Peter, Westcheap, in London, Christopher Branch was married on his twenty-first birthday, September 2, 1519, to Mary Addie, the nineteen-year-old daughter of Francis Addie of Daron, Yorkshire, England. (See St. Peter Westcheap for more information.)

Above: Detail of a 1588 map, showing Tilbury-Hope, just below Gravesend, from where Christopher and Mary Branch boarded the London Merchant, for their voyage to Virginia. In this view, the south side of the river is at the top and west is to the right.Here is what the area looks like today. (Google Maps)

Ships on the River Thames at Deptford, just a few miles above Tilbury-Hope.

Only a few months after their marriage, Christopher immigrated, with his wife, to the Virginia Colony as one of several indentured servants of Captain Thomas Osborne. In March 1619 (O.S.)-1620 (N.S.) they were among the 200 passengers who sailed from Tilbury-hope, below Gravesend, to Virginia, aboard the ship London Merchant, a vessel of 300 tons, arriving probably sometime in April 1619 (O.S.)-1620 (N.S.). Upon arrival, they settled at or near Henricus, in the area known as the College Land--about fifty miles due west of Jamestown, on the north side of the James River. This was the second oldest settlement in Virginia, having been established in 1611 by Sir Thomas Dale on a neck of land called Farrar's Island (by coincidence, I am also a Farrar descendant). At that time, Sir George Yeardley (portrayed in the popular PBS "Jamestown" television series by British actor Jason Iain Flemyng), was governor of the colony, which had been established in 1607 as a business enterprise of the Virginia Company of London-and would remain so until June 1624, when King James I annulled the company's charter, at which time Virginia became a royal colony.

The College Land was an area set aside by law at the first meeting of the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1619, for the establishment of a college at Henricus.

In 1622, the Pamunkey Indians, led by their chief, Opechancanough (brother of Powhatan and uncle of the famous Pocahontas), attempted to drive the English out of Virginia by ferociously attacking settlements up and down the James River. Fortunately, Christopher Branch and his bride escaped the slaughter, which resulted in the deaths of 347 colonists, about one-quarter of the English population of Virginia at the time.

On February 16, 1623 (O.S,) or 1624 (N.S.), Christopher was included in a list of twenty-nine men, including Thomas Osborne, who had survived the Indian attacks and were then living "att ye Colledg Land." A little less than a year later, following the annulment of the Virginia Company's charter, Christopher, his wife, Mary, and their nine-month-old son, Thomas, born in April 1624, were included in a "muster of the inhabitants in Virginia." This muster, ordered by King James I, is dated January 23, 1624 (O.S.) or 1625 (N.S.), The originals of both the 1623/4 census and the 1624/5 Muster are in the Public Record Office, London, England.

Presumably, Christopher spent the years of his indenture (from five to seven, most likely) helping to raise tobacco, the leading commodity of the Virginia Colony, for his master, Thomas Osborne, for whom present-day Osborne's Landing Park, on the north bank of the James River, is named.

Rather than reinvent the wheel, so to speak, I defer to the following account of the life of Christopher Branch, from Branchiana, Being a Partial Account of the Branch Family in Virginia, by James Branch Cabell, published in 1907:

Christopher Branch of "Arrowhattocks" and "Kingsland," in Henrico County, the founder of the Branch family in Virginia, was born in England--and, presumably, within the County of Kent--about the year 1600; and he married there very early in life. With his wife, Mary Branch, whose maiden name is unknown [not true, it was Addie], he emigrated to Virginia in the March of 1619-20, so that in the February of 1623-4, according to the first census ever taken of the inhabitants of Virginia, Christopher Branch was living in Henrico; and the muster of January, 1624-5, names Christopher Branch, his wife, Mary Branch, and their son, Thomas Branch, then nine months old, as resident "att ye Colledg Land."

They had come to Virginia in the London Merchant, of 300 tons, which vessel was despatched from Tilburyhope, in England, by the Virginia Company, in the March of 1619-20, with 200 colonists on board, and reached Virginia some time during the spring of the same year, after a prosperous voyage, during which but one passenger had died.

The precise location of the Branch home at this period is indeterminate, as the College Land was a rather extensive tract set aside by the company, whereon "to erect and build a college in Virginia, for the training and bringing up of infidel's children to the true knowledge of God and understanding of righteousness."

The company designed, in fact, both to Christianize and educate the neighboring Indians; and to this intent it was decided (26th May, 1619), that "a certain piece cf land be laid out in Henrico, which should be called the College Land, and for the planting of the same to send presently fifty good persons to be seated thereon, and to occupy the same according to order, and to have half the benefit of their labour, and the other half to go to setting forward the work and for maintenance of the tutors and scholars."

The scheme, at first enthusiastically taken up by the King and "the several bishops of this kingdom," was abandoned after the Great Massacre of 1622, when the Indians, under Opechancanough, very nearly succeeded in exterminating the Colony, and the assigned lands were thrown open to the public; but it was as one of these "fifty good persons" that Christopher Branch came to America, and he and his wife were among the scant sixty settlers of the College Land who, somehow, survived the massacre; and their oldest son was born upon the heels of it.

At this juncture, let us leave Branchiana behind for the moment and take a look at an episode in Christopher Branch's life that was covered by Cabell in another book, Branch of Abingdon (published in 1911).

In 1632 Christopher Branch returned to England and brought suit to obtain possession of the Bull Inn estate in Abingdon.

This valuable property, as already recorded, had been willed in 1565 by Thomas Branch of London to his brother William Branch of Abingdon, with the proviso that at William Branch’s death it was to go to Thomas Branch of Abingdon, the eldest son of William Branch;, and at the death of Thomas Branch of Abingdon to the sons of this Thomas Branch, or in default of male heirs,to his daughters.

Thomas Branch of Abingdon, as already recorded, died in 1602-3 without children of either sex, and leaving a will by which he bequeathed the Bull Inn to his brother-in-law Robert Payne of Abingdon.

Robert Payne had succeeded to the property and in 1624 had deeded it to his son Richard Payne of Abingdon, the first cousin of Christopher Branch; and it is against this Richard Payne that Christopher Branch brings suit. For at the death of Thomas Branch of Abingdon in 1602-3 his heir at law was his brother Lionel Branch, the second brother Richard Branch being then dead without issue.

Lionel Branch’s death about 1605 left his son Christopher Branch as the heir at law.

The Bull Inn had been bequeathed “to William Braunche .... and to Thomas Braunche his son and heir after his decease, and so unto his heirs males forever; and for lack of heirs males, unto his daughters.”

The question, therefore, was whether, according to the wording of Thomas Branch of London’s will, the Bull Inn was entailed to the heirs males of Thomas Branch of Abingdon? in which event, Thomas Branch of Abingdon had not the power to will the property to Robert Payne, Lionel Branch being his legal heir.

William Branch, the fourth brother, had already brought suit to test the validity of this will, and the case had been decided in Payne’s favor, 13 February, 1603-4. It is possible that William Branch brought this suit as the guardian of Christopher Branch, since William Branch had never the shadow of any personal claim during this nephew’s life.

The pleadings in Christopher Branch’s suit are appended. Chancery Proceedings, Reign of Charles I: B; 31; 34, Branch versus Payne:

“Bill of Complaint of Christopher Braunche of Harrihattocks in Virginia, planter there, which Christopher Braunche is sonne and heire of Lyonnell Braunche third son of William Braunche, while he lived of Abingdon in the countie of Berks, gent, deceased, and wch said William Braunche zvas natural brother and heyre of Thomas Braunche, late -while he lived Citizen and Draper of London, sworn 26 October 1632:

“The said Thomas Braunche was in his life tyme lawfully seised in his demeazne as of ffee of and in all that messuage or tenement scituate in the borough of Abingdon, sometymes an Inne, called or known by the name of the bull Inne, and being so seised did, in or about the moneth of Aprill, in the year 1555, make and ordayne his last will and testament in these words following, vizt:

“I allso will and bequeath unto my natural brother Wil- Ham Braunche my howse called the bull Inne in Abingdon, and unto Thomas Braunche his son and heyre after his decease, and soe unto his heyres males for ever, and for lack of heyres males unto his daughters.

“And shortly after the said William (the scrivener’s error; it should of course he Thomas) Braunche the testator died, and his said last will was in due form proved in the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, by virtue of which said legacy and devise hee the said William Braunche, by and after the decease of the said Thomas Braunche, did enter into the said messuage and thereof was lawfully seised in his demeasne as of freehold for the term of his natural life, with the reversion or remainder thereof expectant in fee tayle general in and upon the said Thomas Braunche his sonne; and hee the said William Braunche shortly after died soe thereof seised.

“By and after whose , decease the said Thomas Braunche, by virtue of the said devise, into the said tenement entered and was thereof lawfully seised in his demeasne as of fee tayle general, that is to say, to him and the heirs males of his boddie lawfully begotten, and for default of such issue to the heirs females of his boddy lawfully begotten; and the said Thomas Braunche about three and thirtie years sithence died soe thereof seised, by and after whose decease one Richard Braunche, being the middle brother of the said Thomas Braunche the tenaunte in tayle and of your orator’s father, dying without issue in the life tyme of the said William Braunche his father, the reversion in fee of the said messuage reverted and came unto Lyonnell Braunche your orator’s father, as right heyre at the Common Law unto the said Thomas the testator.

“By virtue whereof the said Lyonnell Braunche into the said tenement entered and was thereof lawfully seised in his demeane as of fee; and shortly after, vizt., about seaven and twentie years since, as your orator thinketh, the said Lyonnell died.

“By and after whose decease the said tenement descended and came, as of right the same ought, unto your orator and his heyres as sonne and heyre of the said Lyonell his said father.

“But now soe it is, may it please your good Lordshipp, {the Right Honorable Thomas, Lord Coventry, Keeper of the Great Seal, to whom the Bill is addressed) that the said Lyonnell dying when your orator was of but tender years, about two or three years olde, {this would fix 1602 as the date of the birth of Christopher Branch, but it must be remembered, he has every reason to make himself appear as young and helpless at the time of his father’s death as may be possible) and your orator being transported over into Virginia in his infancy (this, any how, is most adroitly put; he was, it is true, a minor at the period alluded to, but the wording certainly woidd not suggest that he was a married man traveling in the company of his wife), where he hath lived by the space of twelve or thirteen years, and never cold make retorne into England till now very lately, one Richard Payne of Abingdon, gentleman, {compare Note I), and one William Bannister of the said towne, mercer, by combinacon have since the death of your orator’s said late father, entered into the said tenement and have ever since received the rents, yssues and proffitts thereof to theire owne use, and have gotten into their hands and possession all the ancient deeds, minuments and writtings touching and concerning the said tenement, and have made divers and sondry secrett conveyances thereof.

“By reason whereof they, the said Payne and Bannister, doe now utterly deny and refuse to deliver unto your orator the said deeds, etc., neither will they suffer him to enter into the said premisses or to injoy the same. “May it therefore please your good Lordshipp to grant his Maties most gratious writt of Subpa to be directed unto the said Richard Payne and William Bannister, commanding them at a certain day and under a certain payne personally to appear before your good Lordshipp in his Maties High Court of Chancery, then and there upon their corporal oathes to answer to the premises; and your poore orator shall ever pray for your good Lordshipp’s long life and increase of much honor.”

“The Plea and Demurrer of Richard Payne, one OF THE DEFENDANTS, UNTO THE BlLL OF COMPLAINT OF Christopher Braunche, sworn 16 November, 1632:

“This defendant sayeth that Robert Payne, his father, was lawfully seised in his demesne as of fee of and in the said messuage, and being so seised, in consideration of a marriage had and solempnized between this defendant and Suzanna his wife, and for the provision of a joynture for this defendant his said wife, he the said Robert Payne and Martha his wife, and one John Mayott of Abingdon, (who had married Joan, the eldest daughter of Robert Payiie; compare the latter’s will as already recorded) in the term of St. Michael, in the two and twentieth year of the reign of our sovereign Lord King James, (that is, in October, 1624) in the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster, did acknowledge and levie one Fine of ye said messuage, by the name of one messuage and one garden in Abingdon in ye countie of Berk:

“By which Fine they the said Robert Payne and Martha his wife and John Mayott did acknowledge the said premises to be ye right of this defendant, as yt which this defendant had of the guift of the said Robert, Martha and John, to the use of this defendant for term of his life, then to the use of the said Susanna for term of her life, then to the use of this defendant and his heirs for ever.”

"Answer of William Bannister, Sworn 16 Nov., 1632:

“This defendant sayeth that about the feast of the Annunciation, 1631, the other defendant, Richard Payne, did demise and let unto him one shop and other rooms, parcel of the said messuage, for the term of five years.”

No decree relating to this suit has been discovered, but it is probable that it was decided against Christopher Branch, as he returned to Virginia shortly afterward, taking out his first land patent there in 1634. It is not known that he ever revisited England.

Let us now return to the story of the life of Christopher Branch, as told in Branchiana:

It was ten years before Christopher Branch--on the 20th October, 1634--patented a hundred acres of land at "Arrowhattocks," in Henrico County, which then comprised the present Chesterfield. (see picture below) This "Arrowhattocks" appears in Captain John Smith's map on the north side of James River, a short distance above the present Dutch Gap; but the eventual and permanent home of Christopher Branch was at "Kingsland," a plantation almost immediately opposite "Arrowhattocks," on the south side of the river, in what is now the County of Chesterfield, where, on the 14th of September, 1636, he patented another hundred acres of land.

A portion of Christopher Branch's first land patent, 1634.

A successful tobacco farmer, he subsequently augmented this modest tract both by purchase and by the taking out of other patents, until he had acquired a rather large plantation in the extreme northeast of Chesterfield, bounded upon the east by James River and upon the south by Proctor's Creek. The present Kingsland Creek ran through his property and takes its name from the former home of Christopher Branch.

He must have come to Virginia very little better than a pauper; but that he subsequently became a man of means, as means then went, and of prominence in at least his county, is evinced by the frequency with which his name occurs in the scant records of the time and the many honorable offices which he occupied. He was, in 1639, to cite an instance, with his immediate neighbor, Captain Thomas Osborne of "Coxendale," one of the viewers of tobacco "from the World's End to Henrico,"--it having been decided by an act of the Assembly that "there be yearly chosen and appointed Men of Experience and in dignity for the Carefull Viewing of each Man's crop of Tobacco"; and he had represented his county in the Virginia House of Burgesses in the year 1629; and was in 1656 appointed one of the justices of the peace for Henrico.

A glance at the various land patents taken out by Christopher Branch is not without interest.

On the 20th of October, 1634, as recorded, Christopher Branch--then of "Arrowhattocks"--leased a hundred acres of land "adjoining the land granted to John Griffin and John Sheffield, and abutting easterly on the main river."

On the 8th of December, 1636, Christopher Branch patented 250 acres at "Kingsland," bounded on the east by the Main river and westerly by the Second creek,"--this being the land formerly "granted to John Griffin, fifty acres for his personal adventure, and 200 for the transportation of four persons." It is interesting to note that within the year Christopher Branch has in some inexplicable fashion acquired and annexed all of his immediate neighbor's land.

Again, on the 14th of September, 1636, as recorded, Christopher Branch patented a hundred acres "in Henrico County, bounded on the east by the river, over against 'Harrow Attocks,' and on the west by the head of Proctors' Creek. Due: by exchange with James Place, and due Place for the transportation of two servants, Richard Pierce and James Hunt."

This looks as though Christopher Branch had traded his hundred acres at "Arrowhattocks" for an additional hundred at "Kingsland," and had finally cast his destiny upon the south side of the river; and there is no further definite record after this date of his ever owning property upon the northern side of the James. This patent, by the way, was subsequently renewed by Sir John Harvey, when Governor of Virginia, and 300 acres added.

A 17th century Virginia tobacco plantation.

It is thus fairly apparent that Christopher Branch met with good luck in his Virginian venture, and achieved success and prominence; but it is unlikely that his life was ever one of luxury. Indeed, it is salutary, in passing, to consider the then condition of Virginia, as recorded by an eye-witness:

"I found the plantations generally seated upon meer salt marshes, full of infectious boggs and muddy creeks and lakes, and hereby subjected to all those inconveniences and diseases which are so commonly found in the most unsound and most unhealthy parts of England...

"The Colony was this winter in much distress of victual...

"Their houses are generally the worst that ever I saw, the meanest cottages in England being every way equal (if not superior) with the most of the best, and, besides, so improvidently and scatteringly are they seated one from another, as partly from their distance, but especially by the interposition of creeks and swamps, as they call them, they offer all advantages to their savage enemies, and are utterly deprived of all sudden recollection of themselves upon any teYms whatsoever...

"I found the ancient plantations of Henrico and Charles City wholly quitted and left to the spoils of the Indians, who not only burnt the houses, said to be once the best of all others, but fell upon the poultry, hogs, cows, goats and horses, whereof they killed great numbers...

"There having been, as it is thought, not fewer than ten thousand souls transported hither, there are not, thro' the aforementioned abuses and neglects, above two thousand of them to be found alive at this present--many of them in a sickly and desperate estate."

In such unenviable circumstances Christopher Branch lived for sixty years, dying at a very advanced age either in the December of 1681 or in the January of 1682.

Immediately previous to his death (2nd November,1681), he had confirmed a former deed of gift to his eldest son, Thomas Branch, of 300 acres of land in Henrico, "which Thomas Branch now lives on," the action being necessitated by some irregularity in the earlier deed. This land faced upon James River, and adjoined the land of John Branch--presumably the same John Branch who was the youngest son of William Branch.

It should be borne in mind, however, that Christopher Branch of "Arrowhattocks" and "Kingsland" was not the only Branch who emigrated to Virginia. There was a John Branch who owned land in Elizabeth City County as early as 1636, was a viewer of tobacco for Elizabeth City in 1639, and represented Elizabeth City in the Virginia Assembly in 1641; but who was apparently unrelated to Christopher Branch of "Kingsland," and, so far as is recorded, left no descendants.

Christopher Branch married, as has been said, Mary--, who died at an early age--apparently before 1630.

By Mary--, Christopher Branch of "Kingsland" had issue:

I. Thomas Branch of Henrico, the oldest son, born April, 1623, and the only child to survive his father. Thomas Branch died in 1693. He had married Elizabeth--, and by her had issue:--Thomas, who married Elizabeth Archer, daughter of George Archer of Henrico, and died in 1728; Matthew, who married , and died in 1726; James, who died without issue in 1737; Elizabeth, who married Melchizadeck Richardson; Martha; a daughter, name unknown, who married Richard Ward of Henrico; William; Margery and John.

II. William Branch of Henrico, born about 1625, presumably the second son, and presumably a namesake of the Protestant fanatic, who died in 1676. William Branch married Jane (she married, second, Abel Gower, in his time justice of the peace and sheriff for Henrico), and by her had issue:-- William, who died young, post 1678, and without leaving issue; John, died in 1788, who married Martha Jones, the daughter of Thomas Jones of Bermuda Hundreds; Sarah; and Mary, who married, first, Thomas Jefferson of Henrico (grandfather of the President), and, second, Joseph Mattox.

III. Christopher Branch of Charles City County, born about 1627.

Christopher Branch of "Kingsland" died, as has been said, between the 1st of December, 1681, and 1st of February, 1681-2.

An inventory of his goods and chattels, too long to be here cited, was recorded 13th of April, 1682, and vividly illustrates how solely was the wealth of Virginia's earlier inhabitants confined to the possession of lands and of slaves, and of so many pounds of tobacco, since their total value, as fixed by the appraisers, is no more than thirty-eight pounds, seven shillings and ten pence. It should be remembered, however, that the purchasing power of money was then, roughly speaking, about nine times that of the present day.

There are no luxuries in this enumeration; it contains, for the most part, only the bare necessities of life; and the library of Christopher Branch consisted of three volumes, one of which, having an undecipherable title, he bequeathed to his oldest and only living son, Thomas Branch; and for the rest Christopher Branch possessed:

"One old Bible, valued at 5 shillings.

"One old ditto, valued at 5 shillings.

And here is his modest list of live stock:

• "3 cows, valued at 35 shillings each.
• "1 Oxen, one 2 years old, 5 shillings ; and one 5 years old at 30 shillings.
• "2 bulls, one 2 years old at 15 shillings, and the other 6 years old at 25 shillings.
• "1 yearling calfe.
• "5 barrowes (gelded pigs), at 15 shillings each.
• "4 sowes, at 15 shillings each.
• "2 shootes (shoats), at 6 shillings each.
• "1 boar, valued at 6 shillings.
• "1 parcel of pyggs, to be divided amongst themselves."

The will of Christopher Branch is recorded at Henrico Court-House. It is dated 20th June, 1678, and was recorded 20th February, 1681-2.

Previous to the making of this will, he had conveyed to his son, Thomas Branch, by various deeds of gift, the entire northern portion of the "Kingsland" plantation, consisting of at least 540 acres, and probably of more; and it is not an outrageous flight of fancy to presume that the second son, William Branch, had been provided for in similar fashion, since the will ignores the heirs of this William Branch precisely as Thomas Branch and his heirs are therein ignored.

It is possible that to William Branch was allotted the "Arrowhattocks" plantation on the north side of the river, inasmuch as the will makes no mention of this property, which Christopher Branch had unquestionably owned and had unquestionably parted with by the year 1678; but as has been recorded, the lease of 14th September, 1636, would seem to indicate that he had made over at least a portion of "Arrowhattocks" to James Place of Henrico, in exchange for an additional hundred acres at "Kingsland."

By ordinary, it was the custom of our early colonists thus to provide for their sons as they reached manhood; and it is deducible that Christopher Branch of "Kingsland," cannily desirous that as little as possible of his estate be squandered upon taxes, had in his lifetime deeded to his elder sons and to their heirs such lands as he intended to leave them. But his youngest son, Christopher Branch of Charles City County, had died young, leaving three boys, all under age when Christopher Branch of "Kingsland" drew up his will ; and it is for them, and for them alone, that the will of their grandfather provides.

Thus to his eldest son, Thomas Branch, the testator bequeaths Merely "my great copper ceattle," and the book whose title is undecipherable, and explicitly confirms a previous deed of gift of some 240 acres : and to William Branch and to John Branch (the children of the testator's second son, William Branch), merely the liberty to "fish and fowle" in all the creeks and swamps of his big plantation.

To the testator's grandson, Christopher Branch (the oldest child of the testator's son, Christopher Branch of Charles City County, and then nineteen years old), is left all the land between James River and the Long Slash-and "slash" here denotes a low and wet and overgrown piece of ground-beginning at the mouth of Proctor's Creek and "running upwards on the river to the pinetree that parts my land and my son Thomas's, and from Proctor's Creek at the lower end of the Long Slash, on the inside of the Long Slash, running up to my son Thomas's land." In other words, after deeding the northern portion to Thomas Branch, the testator bequeaths to his grandson, Christopher Branch, the eastern third of the remainder of his "Kingsland" plantation.

There is, however, a condition stipulated, "provided the said Christopher Branch help to build for his brother Samuel Branch a house four lengths of boards, every length to be five feet, with the help of the negroe and Joab, if they live till Samuel Branch be of ability to keep it, and help him to clear a cornfield sufficiently fenced to keep out hoggs and cattle.

For to the testator's grandson, Samuel Branch, then fifteen years old, is bequeathed the second third of "Kingsland," "all land between the Long Slash and the bottom called by the name of Jackes Bottome, beginning at Proctor's Creek and running up to Thomas Branch's land; provided that the said Samuel Branch, with the help of Christopher Branch and the negro and Jobe, build for Benjamin Branch a house,"--and so on, according to all the specifications of the house to be built for Samuel Branch when he shall come to years of discretion.

For to the youngest grandson, Benjamin Branch, then thirteen years old, is bequeathed the remaining third of 'Kingsland,"-"all the land between Jackes Bottome and* Proctor's Creek, beginning at Proctor's Creek and running up to my son Thomas's land." It is also stipulated, with meticulous forethought, that when the two houses come to be built, Christopher Branch is to supply both Samuel Branch and Benjamin Branch with ''six locus (locust) posts and two im (elm?) posts, "in event of the lands assigned to either containing none af the time of building; and, curiously enough, that if any of the three die under age his lands and property are to go to "the next brother."

This apparently unfair arrangement is perhaps explained by the fact that Christopher Branch is to have for some years the use of the entire estate: for the testator appoints him general manager of "Kingsland" as a whole, and it is to young Christopher Branch that Thomas Branch is to pay such rent for the recently deeded 240 acres "as may be due his Majesty yearly," as well as to Christopher Branch that Samuel Branch and Benjamin Branch are to deliver their annual rental when these two acquire their several portions of "Kingsland"; and it is stipulated that the latter grandsons are to live with Christopher Branch, and under his guardianship, until "they are grown and able to get their land."

Item, "my part of Jobe's labor (the negro previously mentioned), which is one-half his labor, is to go to the maintenance of Benjamin Branch and Samuel Branch and Sarah Branch." This Sarah Branch, as has been said, was the younger daughter of the testator's second son.

It is then stipulated that a certain "cartway to the woods running through the plantation of "Kingsland" be always free to the public; and more lately, by an obvious afterthought, that if either Christopher Branch or Samuel Branch, for any reason, refuse to take part in building the stipulated houses, and so on, the delinquent is to pay 600 pounds of tobacco to the brother he has declined to start in life.

Finally, to Thomas Jefferson of Henrico (who had married, ante 1678, Mary Branch, the older daughter of the testator's second son, and was by her the grandfather of the President), is left one hogshead of tobacco, of 400 pounds weight, inasmuch as the said Thomas Jefferson is to be, with the younger Christopher Branch, the testator's executor; and all other property of which the testator may die possessed is to be divided equally among Christopher Branch and Samuel Branch and Benjamin Branch and Sarah Branch.

The witnesses of this will are Abel Gower (who had married the widow of William Branch, the testator's second son), and Richard Ward (who had married a daughter of Thomas Branch, the testator's oldest son).

Here's Christopher Branch's will in its entirety:

Unfortunately, the final resting place of Christopher Branch and his wife, Mary, has been lost to history.

Thomas Branch, eldest son of Christopher Branch and his wife, Mary Addie Branch, was born in April 1624 in Henrico County, Virginia, where he was raised to maturity.

In early 1681, when Thomas was about fifty-eight years old, his father, Christopher Branch, died, leaving him a copper kettle and a book entitled Ursinsis Catucis. In Christopher's will, he also confirmed an earlier gift of 240 acres of property that he had previously deeded to Thomas. From all accounts, this was a portion of the Kingsland plantation, on the south side of the James River, in what later became Chesterfield County.

The remainder of Kingsland was divided between Christopher Sr.'s grandsons: Christopher, Samuel, and Benjamin, who were the sons of Christopher Branch, Jr..

Unfortunately, very little is known about Thomas Branch, Sr. apart from the above and the fact that he married a woman named Elizabeth Gouch or Gough, with whom he had the following named children:

1. Thomas Branch, Jr., born about 1658, married Elizabeth Mary Ann Archer.
2. Matthew Branch, born about 1661, married name unknown.
3. Martha Branch, born about 1663, married Richard Ward.
4. James Branch, born about 1666, married name unknown.
5. Elizabeth Branch, born about 1668, married Melchizedeck Richardson.

Thomas Branch, Sr. died in 1694. His will, which was admitted for probate in Henrico County, is as follows:

Thomas' widow, Elizabeth, died three years later. Her will, also admitted to probate in Henrico County, reads as follows:

As it is with his parents, the final resting of Thomas Branch, Sr., and his wife, Elizabeth, has been lost to history.